Read + Write + Report
Home | Start a blog | About Orble | FAQ | Sites | Writers | Advertise | My Orble | Login
 
Quote of the day: "102.1 Harmison to Ponting, no run, wide and Ponting has to stretch to reach it. "Harmison couldn't hit an elephant from 20 paces?" was Jeff Thomson's assessment earlier. Guess it depends on the size of the elephant." - baggygreen.com

Uni Students Caught Out Cheating - So what else is new?

Sydney: Figures have been released today which suggest that universities are facing an explosion of plagiarism and cheating in exams.

It is estimated almost 3500 students have been caught cheating across Sydney's 8 major campuses since 2001.

Wollongong has found that its law students were among the most likely to commit plagiarism in essays and assignments, "Lets face facts," the Dean of Law said, "Law is about getting around standard axioms such as rights, we teach our students to challenge everything. I'm surprised all they've done is cheated."

The Vice-Chancellor of Macquarie University Steven Schwarz had a far more imposing responce, "We cannot accept this kind of behaviour. To blatently copy anothers work without reference is academic theft. Our students are meant to be illumini in the community, not petty thiefs."


The Vice-Chancellor of Sydney Uni Gavin Brown reflected these sentiments strongly, "We cannot accept this kind of behaviour. To blatently copy anothers work without reference is academic theft. Our students are meant to be illumini in the community, not petty thiefs."

John Howard has been briefed on the outbreak of plagairism but seems unfussed. "If you have a winning formula you should steal it, just look at my foreign policy."

Australia is just waiting for Labor to take control of both houses for the prophesy to come full circle.
123
Vote


   
Subscribe to this blog 


Just this blog This blog and DailyOrble (recommended)

   

   

   


Comments
13 Comments. [ Add A Comment ]
1. November 20th 2006 @ 01:48. TonyK Says:
Assume u used the same quote for two different people on purpose?
2. November 20th 2006 @ 01:55. Stuart Says:
Precisely
3. November 20th 2006 @ 03:39. Adele Says:
That was funny. Are the figures true? How many students have been through those campuses in that time?
4. November 20th 2006 @ 03:53. Mrs M Says:
We were guilty of handing in the same essay for two different subjects. Not quite plagiarism....

Very funny post.
5. November 20th 2006 @ 14:20. Brenton Says:
We were guilty of handing in the same essay for two different subjects. How many students have been through those campuses in that time?
Not quite plagiarism.... Assume u used the same quote for two different people on purpose?

Very funny post.

I dig it.
6. November 20th 2006 @ 21:32. Stuart Says:
Nice on Brenton,

Yeah the figures are true, as for how many students would go through in a year, thats anyone's guess.

I had a uni degree that was impossible to plagiarise, film production. Hard to copy a film perfectly shot for shot.
7. November 20th 2006 @ 23:57. StephenP Says:
Hi Mediated, and great post by the way,

Can I just bring up a controversial example of cheating at my old uni - this may sound a bit racist, but I can't help the facts.

In a particular course, I think it was either Media Law or Introduction to Marketing, we had a group of three Asian Students. As part of assessement, we had to present a 15 minute oral presentation in front of other classs members about somethnig which I vaguely remember now.

Now, the three students got up and presented their presentation, in what can only be described as basic english. In their defence, what they were saying did make sense, and did last for the 15 minutes.

But, compared to the other presentations, it was one of the more primitive and basic orals to be presented, yet they still managed to achieve a distinction for their efforts. And I did also read their written component which was submitted, and lets just say that the written component sounded extremely advanced compared to their verbal presentation.

I know it sounds like I am picking on a minority, but to me it seems a bit sus, that their two pieces of work submitted could differ in content so greatly, yet still receive a decent grade (I know what grade they got as it was posted on a noticeboard)

Am I being prejudiced?

Cheers,

StephenP.
8. November 21st 2006 @ 00:17. Stuart Says:
Haha and here comes the kettle of worms...

The catch with it all is that unless you are stupid, plagiarism is very hard to detect. I know for me I was the opposite, verbal component I'd blitz, written was the everest for me.

So it's tough to say.

I remember my old science headmaster at highschool, being the sage he was he dealt out this pearler before our Year 10 major exams,

"Remember if you copy only one source, that's plagiarism.
Copy more than one source, that's research."

He had a point
9. November 21st 2006 @ 01:07. Lilla Says:
...ain't that the truth!
10. November 21st 2006 @ 01:10. Lilla Says:
Sorry Stuart,

...hit the wrong button and can't find the [modify] toggle...I think the machine is ganging up on me again...

...just flitting through, thought I'd leave a comment...

I love the subtleties of your *errghm, cough, chuckle* "report"

Very well researched....*lol*

Lilla...
11. November 21st 2006 @ 01:13. Stuart Says:
We at mediated.com.au pride ourselves on the very best fabrications of quotes that a monkey with a typewriter can buy.

Truth be told though the first paragraph or two of each story is normally straight up fact.

Its after that that I have fun embelishing, perhaps I should introduce a colour coding scheme for those who want to discren the genuine from my imagination
12. November 21st 2006 @ 02:19. Brenton Says:
Mmm... well, the Asian thing might not be that suss.

I've beein doing Japanese for 6 years, and I know some people can rip out a perfect Japanese essay, yet have the worst Godawful speech, depending on what particular strengths they have.

Personally, I pwn at speaking, and my essays suck.
13. December 27th 2006 @ 22:27. Stanley Says:
haha that dean of law quote is gold! but speaking as a law student plagiarism is kind of a nebulous concept because all our exams are open book, we can bring in notes which of course tend to be passed down from the higher year levels.

so, where is the line drawn? but i guess the dean is talking about assignments and essays so that might be a different kettle of fish.

sorry, this post didn't make any sense because it's the summer holidays and my brain is on hiatus.

Add A Comment

To create a fully formatted comment please click here.


CLICK HERE TO LOGIN | CLICK HERE TO REGISTER

Name or Orble Tag
Home Page (optional)
Comments
Bold Italic Underline Strikethrough Separator Left Center Right Separator Quote Insert Link Insert Email
Notify me of replies
Notify extra people about this comment
Is this a private comment?
List the Email Addresses or Orble Tags of the people you would like to be notified about this comment


One per line max of 30

List the Email Addresses or Orble Tags of the people you would like to be notified about this private comment thread. Only the people in this list will be able to see or reply to your comment.


One per line max of 30

Your Name
(for the email going out to the above list, it can be different to your Orble Tag)
Your Email Address
(optional)
(required for reply notification)
Submit
More Posts
2 Posts
3 Posts
7 Posts
46 Posts dating from November 2006
Email Subscription
Receive e-mail notifications of new posts on this blog:
0
Moderated by Stuart
Copyright © 2006 2007 2008 On Topic Media PTY LTD. All Rights Reserved. Design by Vimu.com.
On Topic Media ZPages: Sydney |  Melbourne |  Brisbane |  London |  Birmingham |  Leeds     [ Advertise ] [ Contact Us ] [ Privacy Policy ]